Early Specialization Part 2
In case you don’t read the comments, this was posted after part 1, I usually will not repost a cooment but, this leads to my next point
“Great article and I agree in principle. However, considering
soccer in the UK many of the development programmes for
talented kids are run by professional clubs and they force
the hand of children and parents. The clubs recruit players
at under 9 or younger as part of the Football Association
player development scheme. The numbers who actually
come through this system and play soccer for a living
are tiny! That is not to say that those who do not play
as their job drop out (no stats). My point is the early
specialisation in soccer has been made almost essential
for those who want to play at a high level. Individuals
who stay on a recreational team will be disadvantaged
when it comes to coaching opportunities and time with
a ball at their feet. I assume that it has become far more
difficult to play at the highest level without the systematic
training offered by Football Academies and Centre
of Excellences throughout the UK.”
This is exactly what is wrong with hockey in the US. It’s not pro clubs but youth clubs encouraging specialization. The “specialization” is why we have less and less skilled Americans in the NHL. The Europeans play a 40 game season and dominate the game currently. My guess is the UK will need to look outside the country for impact players as the system fails them.
December 5, 2008 at 5:39 am
[...] http://mboyle1959.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/early-specialization-part-2/ [...]
October 27, 2008 at 3:31 am
This also happens here in Brazil with soccer. Just see what happen with the knees of the 28+ players.
October 26, 2008 at 5:11 am
Do we train to be athletes that play soccer or turn soccer players into athletes? Those kids that don’t make the grade into professional, are they equipped with the basic physical/athletic attributes to play another sport at the highest level? Or is that talent lost from sport forever?